Who saw clash of the titans.I thought it could have been way better.the story was to big to be contained in that small time.The fight scence were to few and not enough of the greek patheon was shown. who say it and what do you think.

I've only seen the original from 1981 which I loved. I want to go see this one and see if it's as good as the original.

I saw it, and I disagree. It was great, and I feel it lived up to the original completely. I don't see where they could have injected more action without sacrificing storyline. The cast did wonderfully, and I really can't think of a single complaint I have about it, save for the fact that the 3d was not worth the extra 5 bucks. Save your money on that front.

yeah i havent seen it yet but they say the 3d is horrible. that it actually makes the movie worse. just see it the old fasion way.....which actually would be 3d....but older then that.

It doesnt so much make it WORSE, but it doesn't add anything worthwhile.

I'm such a big fan of Harryhausens work I don't think it should be Sullied by Computer graphics.

While I respect your opinion, Super Hero, I always take issue when people are unwilling to give something a chance because it isn't the original.

I know a kid who refuses to see the remake because the original cast isn't in it. I can't wrap my head around it, especially because the movie really is good, and does do the original justice.

It's the same issue I have with people boycotting Repo Men! because they're (incorrectly) assuming that it'd a rip off of Repo! The Genetic Opera. Honestly, if you like something, and something similar exists, why not try it? You might LOVE it.

wait...there are people who defend Repo!?

Repo! is win.

Repo men was good too.